The Climate Agency
text here

The Heat You Can't Outrun

Why Rising Heat Is Becoming Impossible to Survive

Susana Haing, Janice Rincon, Bryan Nguyen, Michael Kroyan

SCROLL
Wet-bulb temperature is one of the simplest (and most important) metrics for understanding how heat affects the human body. Unlike the temperature you hear on the news, wet-bulb temperature captures both heat and humidity at the same time.
That matters because evaporation is the body’s main cooling mechanism. When we sweat, the moisture on our skin pulls heat away as it evaporates. But when the air is already saturated with humidity, sweat stops evaporating. The body can no longer cool itself, even in shade or with hydration.
Scientists warn that a sustained wet-bulb temperature of 35°C (95°F) is the upper limit of human survivability. Danger begins far earlier: at 28–31°C, people can suffer heat stroke, confusion, or cardiovascular strain.

How does it affect us?

Let's see how wet-bulb temperatures will evolve across the United States.


US Wet Bulb Temperature In:

Tip: Hover over to see more details!

Global Fossil Fuel Emissions


Let’s look at how emissions have changed over time among major nations— and what this means for the next 50 years of heat and humidity risk.

CO₂ Emissions (Tons)

Max Wet-Bulb Temperature (in 50 years)

1975

In 1975, the global landscape of emissions looked very different. The United States and Western Europe remained among the highest emitters, even as the ongoing oil crisis slowed industrial growth. Despite this, the regions facing the hottest wet-bulb temperatures in the future are not the top emitters. Instead, countries like Bangladesh, India, and parts of Southeast Asia lead future extreme-temperature risk. These areas emitted relatively little in 1975, yet were projected to face the most dangerous heat-humidity levels. The imbalance between responsibility and vulnerability is already clear at this early point in the timeline.

1980

By 1980, the oil crisis had ended, and global energy demand accelerated again. Fossil fuel use rebounded quickly, especially in rapidly industrializing economies. Yet the pattern remains: the nations emitting the most, such as the U.S., USSR, and Western Europe, are not the ones projected to experience the highest wet-bulb extremes in 2030. Instead, much hotter future temperatures will strike tropical, densely populated regions like India, Myanmar, and coastal West Africa. The gap between northern emitters and equatorial heat exposure continues to widen.

1990

In 1990, emissions surged alongside globalization and expanding manufacturing. China’s rise was beginning, while the U.S. remained the single largest emitter. Yet future wet-bulb extremes in 2040 still cluster around South Asia, the Middle East, and equatorial Africa. Countries like Pakistan and the UAE, which were smaller emitters at the time, are projected to face some of the world's highest heat-humidity stress. Emissions and exposure continue to diverge.

2005

By 2005, China had overtaken the U.S. as the world’s largest emitter. Energy use was skyrocketing across Asia, while global transportation and industrial expansion drove emissions to record levels. Still, the hottest projected wet-bulb temperatures in 2055 remain concentrated in tropical climates. Heat-saturated regions are already close to physiological limits. High-emitting nations with cooler climates continue to shape the warming experienced elsewhere.

2010

In 2010, global emissions kept rising even as renewables began scaling. China, the U.S., and the EU dominated fossil fuel output. But the highest wet-bulb temperatures expected in 2060 concentrate in regions like South Asia and the Persian Gulf, areas already under severe heat strain. These regions contribute less carbon per capita, but face the harshest weather and temperature patterns.

2020

By 2020, brief dips in emissions caused by the pandemic gave way to a rapid rebound. Global totals remain near all-time highs. Meanwhile, the regions projected to have the most dangerous wet-bulb levels in 2070 are densely populated and vulnerable. Even today, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and the Gulf states see heat-humidity extremes more severe than high-emitting northern nations. The mismatch between who drives warming and who suffers from it remains clear.


How the World Warms


Explore the 3D globe to see where future wet-bulb temperatures rise fastest— and which regions face the greatest climate risk.

Year:

In conclusion,


our visualizations reveal an intriguing disparity: the countries driving the most carbon emissions are not always the ones projected to be facing the most extreme, life-threatening wet-bulb temperatures. Major emitters like the U.S. and China dominate the CO₂ bar chart, but our globe shows places like Southeast Asia, parts of Africa, the Middle East, and coastal regions around the world bearing some of the harshest heat stress. Places that contribute far less to global emissions are pushed closest to the limits of human survivability, while many of the biggest polluters are better resourced to adapt. By putting these two views side by side, our project highlights a core injustice of the climate crisis: those who warm the planet the most are not necessarily those who suffer or most severely from the heat.

By taking action at the individual level, we can collectively build a more equitable, cooler planet.

Write Up:

1. What have you done so far?
So far, we have implemented visualizations for California, the United States, and the globe. Each of these visualizations includes interactive features, though they vary in complexity. For California and the US, users can interact through scrollytelling updates and tooltips that display Wet-Bulb temperature data when hovering over a county or state. The globe visualization is fully interactive, allowing users to click, drag, zoom, and explore temperature data worldwide. We have primarily focused on scrollytelling as the main mechanism for guiding users through the story of our data. The goal has been to create a narrative that is both informative and engaging, with interactions that enhance understanding. Currently, transitions between visualizations are basic, such as simple fade-ins and fade-outs. We are planning to refine these to make the experience more seamless and intuitive.

2. What will be the most challenging part of your project and design and why?
The most challenging part of our project to design is likely the overall website itself. We have ideas in mind for the layout, ordering of visualizations, and how users will navigate the page, but turning this vision into a cohesive design is difficult. Creating a balance between aesthetics, branding, and clarity of information is particularly challenging because we want the page to be both engaging and easy to understand. Currently, transitions are simple, and the page feels bare besides the visualizations. We hope to implement smoother transitions, such as zooming out from California to the US, and then out to the globe, to make navigation more fluid. Choosing the right color schemes and visual encodings is also difficult because it must accurately represent the data without overwhelming the user. Additionally, making the website responsive and functional across devices adds another layer of complexity. Overall, designing a cohesive, visually appealing, and informative experience will likely require the most effort.