Let's see how wet-bulb temperatures will evolve across the United States.
Let’s look at how emissions have changed over time among major nations— and what this means for the next 50 years of heat and humidity risk.
In 1975, the global landscape of emissions looked very different. The United States and Western Europe remained among the highest emitters, even as the ongoing oil crisis slowed industrial growth. Despite this, the regions facing the hottest wet-bulb temperatures in the future are not the top emitters. Instead, countries like Bangladesh, India, and parts of Southeast Asia lead future extreme-temperature risk. These areas emitted relatively little in 1975, yet were projected to face the most dangerous heat-humidity levels. The imbalance between responsibility and vulnerability is already clear at this early point in the timeline.
By 1980, the oil crisis had ended, and global energy demand accelerated again. Fossil fuel use rebounded quickly, especially in rapidly industrializing economies. Yet the pattern remains: the nations emitting the most, such as the U.S., USSR, and Western Europe, are not the ones projected to experience the highest wet-bulb extremes in 2030. Instead, much hotter future temperatures will strike tropical, densely populated regions like India, Myanmar, and coastal West Africa. The gap between northern emitters and equatorial heat exposure continues to widen.
In 1990, emissions surged alongside globalization and expanding manufacturing. China’s rise was beginning, while the U.S. remained the single largest emitter. Yet future wet-bulb extremes in 2040 still cluster around South Asia, the Middle East, and equatorial Africa. Countries like Pakistan and the UAE, which were smaller emitters at the time, are projected to face some of the world's highest heat-humidity stress. Emissions and exposure continue to diverge.
By 2005, China had overtaken the U.S. as the world’s largest emitter. Energy use was skyrocketing across Asia, while global transportation and industrial expansion drove emissions to record levels. Still, the hottest projected wet-bulb temperatures in 2055 remain concentrated in tropical climates. Heat-saturated regions are already close to physiological limits. High-emitting nations with cooler climates continue to shape the warming experienced elsewhere.
In 2010, global emissions kept rising even as renewables began scaling. China, the U.S., and the EU dominated fossil fuel output. But the highest wet-bulb temperatures expected in 2060 concentrate in regions like South Asia and the Persian Gulf, areas already under severe heat strain. These regions contribute less carbon per capita, but face the harshest weather and temperature patterns.
By 2020, brief dips in emissions caused by the pandemic gave way to a rapid rebound. Global totals remain near all-time highs. Meanwhile, the regions projected to have the most dangerous wet-bulb levels in 2070 are densely populated and vulnerable. Even today, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and the Gulf states see heat-humidity extremes more severe than high-emitting northern nations. The mismatch between who drives warming and who suffers from it remains clear.
Explore the 3D globe to see where future wet-bulb temperatures rise fastest— and which regions face the greatest climate risk.
our visualizations reveal an intriguing disparity: the countries driving the most carbon emissions are not always the ones projected to be facing the most extreme, life-threatening wet-bulb temperatures. Major emitters like the U.S. and China dominate the CO₂ bar chart, but our globe shows places like Southeast Asia, parts of Africa, the Middle East, and coastal regions around the world bearing some of the harshest heat stress. Places that contribute far less to global emissions are pushed closest to the limits of human survivability, while many of the biggest polluters are better resourced to adapt. By putting these two views side by side, our project highlights a core injustice of the climate crisis: those who warm the planet the most are not necessarily those who suffer or most severely from the heat.
By taking action at the individual level, we can collectively build a more equitable, cooler planet.
1. What have you done so far?
So far, we have
implemented visualizations for California, the United States, and the
globe. Each of these visualizations includes interactive features,
though they vary in complexity. For California and the US, users can
interact through scrollytelling updates and tooltips that display
Wet-Bulb temperature data when hovering over a county or state. The
globe visualization is fully interactive, allowing users to click, drag,
zoom, and explore temperature data worldwide. We have primarily focused
on scrollytelling as the main mechanism for guiding users through the
story of our data. The goal has been to create a narrative that is both
informative and engaging, with interactions that enhance understanding.
Currently, transitions between visualizations are basic, such as simple
fade-ins and fade-outs. We are planning to refine these to make the
experience more seamless and intuitive.
2. What will be the most challenging part of your project and design
and why?
The most challenging part of our project to design is likely the
overall website itself. We have ideas in mind for the layout, ordering
of visualizations, and how users will navigate the page, but turning
this vision into a cohesive design is difficult. Creating a balance
between aesthetics, branding, and clarity of information is particularly
challenging because we want the page to be both engaging and easy to
understand. Currently, transitions are simple, and the page feels bare
besides the visualizations. We hope to implement smoother transitions,
such as zooming out from California to the US, and then out to the
globe, to make navigation more fluid. Choosing the right color schemes
and visual encodings is also difficult because it must accurately
represent the data without overwhelming the user. Additionally, making
the website responsive and functional across devices adds another layer
of complexity. Overall, designing a cohesive, visually appealing, and
informative experience will likely require the most effort.